Allowed

Syam Kumar v. State

Kerala HC7 Dec 2010Bail Appl./7521/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam granted bail to the accused Syam Kumar, arrested for offences under Sections 363 and 366-A IPC, directing his release on 15 December 2010 conditioned upon execution of a bond and compliance with reporting and non-interference clauses.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail from the date of this order with effect from 15/12/2010 on execution of a bond for ₹15,000 with two solvent sureties, subject to conditions.

Syam Kumar Vs State — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Kerala HC (2010)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 7TH DECEMBER 2010 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 7521 of 2010() ----------------------------CMP.8515/2010 of J.M.F.C.-I,KOTTARAKKARA .................... (CRIME NO.2744/2010 OF KOTTARAKKARA POLICE STATION) ...

¶3

PETITIONER/ACCUSED: -------------------------------------SYAM KUMAR, S/O. VASU, VALIYAMADHAMVILA VEEDU, NADUKKUNNU MURI, MELILA VILLAGE. BY ADVS. SRI.RAM MOHAN.G., SRI.G.P.SHINOD.

¶4

RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT/STATE: -------------------------------------------------------------STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶5

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK

¶6

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶7

Kss

¶8

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

¶9

Bail Application No.7521 of 2010

¶10

-----------------------------------------------------Dated this the 07^th day of December, 2010

¶11

ORDER

¶12

In this Petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the petitioner, who is the sole accused in Crime No.2744 of 2010 of Kottarakkara Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 363 & 366-A I.P.C., seeks his enlargement on bail. The petitioner was arrested on 05/11/2010.

¶13

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶14

Having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of judicial custody undergone by the petitioner, the present stage of investigation of the case and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail with effect from 15/12/2010 on his executing a bond for `15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned and subject to the following conditions:-

¶15

Bail Appln.No.7521/2010

¶16

: 2 :

¶17

The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

¶18

The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the police at any time till the filing of the final report.

¶19

The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶20

The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶21

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶22

This application is allowed as above.

¶23

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

¶24

skj

Syam Kumar v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Syam Kumar v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.P.Shahis and 3 Others Vs the State of Kerala

Rahul Vs State of Kerala

Shri.Kamal Singh Vs Special Public Prosecutor

Naveen Chandran and Another Vs State of Kerala

Mrs.Saudamini & Another Vs State of Kerala

Praveen Vs State of Kerala