Dismissed

Ramesh and Others v. the State of Kerala

Kerala HC1 Dec 2010Bail Appl./7376/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail application for offences under various IPC sections, the court denied anticipatory bail. Instead, it directed the petitioners to surrender for interrogation by the investigating officer on specified dates, after which the Magistrate would consider the bail application.

What did the court decide?

Direction to surrender before IO on 13/12/2010 or 14/12/2010 for interrogation; Magistrate to consider bail application thereafter.

Ramesh and Others Vs the State of Kerala — Quashing and FIR | Kerala HC (2010)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DECEMBER 2010 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA 1932

¶4

Bail Appl..No. 7376 of 2010() ---------------------------------(CRIME NO. 406/2010 OF THE KONGAD POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT)

¶5

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.4 TO 8

¶6

-----------------------------------------

¶7

1. RAMESH, S/O.RAMANKUTTY, AGED 28 YEARS, PARAKKAL HOUSE, THRIPPALAMUNDA, PARASSERY, KONGAD.

¶8

2. VENUGOPALAN.K, S/O.KRISHNAN KUTTY NAIR,"GOKULAM" PARASSERY, KONGAD.

¶9

3. BINESH, S/O.NARAYANAN, KUNNATH HOUSE, PARASSERY, KONGAD.

¶10

4. KRISHNANKUTTY, S/O.PONNU, PALLIPARAMBU HOUSE,PARASSERY, KONGAD.

¶11

5. PRATHAPAN, S/O.BHASKARAN, KARIYAKOVIL HOUSE,THRIPPALAMUNDA, PARASSERY, KONGAD.

¶12

BY ADVS. SRI.N.RAGHURAJ

¶13

SRI. A.V.RAVI SMT.A.AMMINIKUTTY

¶14

RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT

¶15

--------------------------------------

¶16

THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KONGAD POLICE STATION,THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM.

¶17

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ

¶18

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/12/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

svs/

¶20

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

¶21

Bail Application No.7376 of 2010

¶22

Dated this the 01^st day of December, 2010

¶23

ORDER

¶24

The petitioners, who are accused Nos.4 to 8 in Crime No.406 of 2010 of Kongad Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 326, 308 & 149 I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail.

¶25

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

¶26

Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioners to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have their application for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioners shall surrender before the investigating officer on 13/12/2010 or on 14/12/2010 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. The petitioners shall thereafter be produced before the Magistrate who on being satisfied that the petitioners have been interrogated by the police shall consider and dispose of their application for regular bail preferably on the same date on which it is filed.

¶27

This petition is disposed of as above.

¶28

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

¶29

skj

Ramesh and Others v. the State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh and Others v. the State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nishor.T.M. Vs State of Kerala

Niyas Vs State of Kerala

Thankappan Vs State of Kerala

Priya Nikethan Vs State of Kerala

K.G.Sahadevan Vs Vijayaraghavan Unni & Another

Siddique Vs State of Kerala