This bail application was dismissed as futile because the respondent counsel submitted that no crime had been registered and the petitioner was not wanted.
Petitioner's application for anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 9TH DECEMBER 2010 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA 1932
Bail Appl..No. 6010 of 2010(A) -----------------------------------------[CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER]
PETITIONER:
-------------------
KEVIN ALEX VADEKKEDOM, VADAKKEDATHU, NATTAPPALIL, ONALLOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA, KERALA.
BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SASITH PANICKER.
RESPONDENTS:
------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA.
R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZE.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/12/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
prv.
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
Bail Application No.6010 of 2010
Dated this the 09th day of December, 2010
ORDER
Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail on the allegation that the Pathanamthitta Police are at his heels on an allegation of commission of non-bailable offences.
Recording the submission made by the Public Prosecutor, this petition is dismissed.
V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE)
skj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for anticipatory bail is maintainable when no crime has been registered.
Kevin Alex Vadekkedom
State of Kerala
Sub Inspector of Police, Pathanamthitta
V. Ramm Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
