Dismissed

Jaimon Thomas v. Superintendent of Police

Kerala HC13 Sept 2010Bail Appl./4801/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge order on anticipatory bail where High Court refused grant, directed petitioner to surrender for interrogation by 23/9/2010 or 24/9/2010, and directed regular bail to be considered shortly thereafter by the Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to surrender on 23/09/2010 or 24/09/2010 for interrogation; regular bail to be considered by Magistrate thereafter.

Jaimon Thomas Vs Superintendent of Police — Corruption | Kerala HC (2010)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

MONDAY, THE 13TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 22ND BHADRA 1932

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 4801 of 2010(A) -----------------------------------------(CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, KANJIKUZHI POLICE STATION) ................

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

-------------------

¶8

JAIMON THOMAS,S/O.THOMAS,AGED 30 YEARS, MYLAPRAYIL HOUSE,CHAPATH.P.O,AYYAPPANKOVIL VILLAGE, IDUKKI.

¶9

BY ADV. SRI.A.C.DEVASIA.

¶10

RESPONDENTS:

¶11

------------------------

¶12

1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CRIME BRANCH,(ECONOMIC OFFENCE), KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 001.

¶13

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KANJIKUZHI POLICE STATION,KOTTAYAM – 686 001.

¶14

3. THE STATE OF KERALA, THROUGH REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶15

R1 TO R3 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITWIK.

¶16

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/09/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶17

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

¶18

Bail Application No.4801 of 2010

¶19

Dated this the 13^th day of September, 2010

¶20

ORDER

¶21

The petitioner, who is the fourth^. accused in Crime No.76/2009 of Ramapuram Police Station (re-registered as Crime214/CR/EDW/I/CBCID/09) for offences punishable under Sections 420, 120B, 506(i) & 34 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail.

¶22

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

¶23

Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have his application for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer on 23/9/2010 or on 24/9/2010 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. The petitioner shall thereafter be produced before the Magistrate who on being satisfied that the

¶24

Bail Appln.No.4801/2010

¶25

: 2 :

¶26

petitioner has been interrogated by the police shall consider and dispose of his application for regular bail preferably on the same date on which it is filed.

¶27

This petition is disposed of as above.

¶28

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

¶29

skj

Jaimon Thomas v. Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jaimon Thomas v. Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dileepkhan Vs State of Kerala

Varghese Vs State

Shine Joseph Vs State of Kerala

Babu Kesavan Vs State of Kerala

Surendran and Another Vs State of Kerala

Jamsheer Vs State