Allowed

Riyas P.H. v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC5 Apr 2010Bail Appl./477/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Kerala granted anticipatory bail to a fifth accused in a case involving offenses under various sections of the IPC. The accused was directed to execute a bail bond with sureties and comply with standard conditions regarding witness tampering and committing new offenses.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on execution of bond for Rs. 15,000 with two solvent sureties.

Riyas P.H. Vs State of Kerala — Bail and Remand | Kerala HC (2010)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 5TH APRIL 2010 / 15TH CHAITHRA 1932

¶3

Bail Appl..No. 477 of 2010(F) --------------------------------------CRIME NO.811/2009 OF WADAKKANCHERY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR.

¶4

APPLICANT/5TH ACCUSED:

¶5

¶6

RIYAS P.H. AGED 19 YEARS, S/O.POOPARAMBIL ABDUL RAHIMAN, S.N.NAGAR, IRUNILAMKODE P.O., MULLURKKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

¶7

BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU SRI.VIPIN NARAYAN

¶8

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

¶9

¶10

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTING THE S.I.OF POLICE, WADAKKANCHERRY POLICE STATION.

¶11

SRI. TEKCHAND, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶12

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶13

K.T. SANKARAN, J.

¶14

B.A. No.477 of 2010

¶15

Dated this the 5^th day of April, 2010

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the fifth accused in Crime No.811/2009 of Wadakkanchery Police Station, Thrissur.

¶18

The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324 and 452 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶19

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶20

It is submitted that accused Nos.3 and 7 to 9 were granted anticipatory bail.

¶21

Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the offence and other circumstances, I am of the view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner. There will be a direction that in the event of the arrest of the petitioner, the officer in charge of the police station shall release him on bail on his executing bond for

¶22

B.A. No.477 /2010

¶23

¶24

Rs.15,000/- with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the

¶25

satisfaction of the officer concerned, subject to the following conditions:

¶26

A) The petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer for interrogation as and when required;

¶27

B) The petitioner shall not try to influence the prosecution witnesses or tamper with the evidence;

¶28

C) The petitioner shall not commit any offence or indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail;

¶29

D) In case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶30

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated

¶31

above.

¶32

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE

¶33

scm

Riyas P.H. v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Riyas P.H. v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.K.Joseph Vs State of Kerala

K.v.Varghese Vs State of Kerala

Dileep Vs State of Kerala

M.K.Satheeshan Vs State of Kerala

Rajesh Vs State of Kerala

R.Manoj Vs State of Kerala