Allowed

Suresh Kumar & Others v. Letha & Another

Kerala HC23 Sept 2010Bail Appl./3969/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants anticipatory bail to four petitioners accused in Crime No. 264 of 2010 under Sections 498A, 342, and 307 IPC. The court directed their release upon execution of a bond with conditions including weekly reporting, interrogation availability, and surrender for regular bail.

What did the court decide?

Grant of anticipatory bail for one month byexecution of bond with conditions of reporting, surrender, and non-interference.

Suresh Kumar & Others Vs Letha & Another — Domestic Violence | Kerala HC (2010)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 23RD SEPTEMBER 2010 / 1ST ASWINA 1932

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 3969 of 2010(A) ----------------------------------(CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN)

¶6

PETITIONER(S)/

¶7

--------------------

¶8

1. SURESH KUMAR,S/O.SANKARANKUTTY, PALANNUR VEEDU,KADUVANKAL MURI,VALLIKUNNAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

¶9

2. LEELAMMA, W/O.SANKARANKUTTY, PALANNUR VEEDU,KADUVANKAL MURI,VALLIKUNNAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

¶10

3. ANILKUMAR, S/O.SANKARANKUTTY, PALANNUR VEEDU,KADUVANKAL MURI,VALLIKUNNAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

¶11

4. SANKARANKUTTY, PALANNUR VEEDU,KADUVANKAL MURI,VALLIKUNNAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

¶12

BY ADV. SRI.N.VIMALAN

¶13

RESPONDENT(S):

¶14

---------------

¶15

1. LETHA,D/O.CHANDRAN PILLAI, CHANNANATHOPPIL VEEDU,THEKKUMBHAGOM,CHAVARA, KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK, KOLLAM.

¶16

2. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶17

R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK

¶18

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

SVS/

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application NO. 3969 of 2010

¶23

- - - - DATED: 23-09-2010

¶24

O R D E R

¶25

In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioners who are the accused in Crime No. 264 of 2010 of Vallikkunnam Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 498 A, 342 and 307 read with Sec. 34 I.P.C. seek anticipatory bail.

¶26

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶27

Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners and the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer-in-charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioners on bail for a period of one month in the event of their arrest in connection with the above case on each of them executing a bond for Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction to the said officer and subject to the following conditions:

¶28

Bail Application NO. 3969 of 2010

¶29

-:2:-

¶30

Petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

¶31

Petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation including custodial interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

¶32

Petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶33

Petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶34

Petitioners shall surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail in the meanwhile.

¶35

If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶36

This application is allowed as above.

¶37

Dated this the 23^rd day of September, 2010.

Sd/- V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE.

ani.

/true copy/

P.S. to Judge

Bail Application NO. 3969 of 2010 -:3:-

Suresh Kumar & Others v. Letha & Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Kumar & Others v. Letha & Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudheendran and Others Vs the Station House Officer,Ezhikone.Polic

Praveen Kumar Vs State of Kerala

Anil Kumar Vs State of Kerala

Chithresh Vs the State of Kerala

Priyan and Others Vs State of Kerala and Another

Santhosh Vs State