Shinu v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala considered a bail application by accused No. 2 charged with obstruction of public servants. Despite the petitioner's delay in reporting, the court found the case false and granted bail subject to a bond and specific reporting conditions.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner released on bail on a bond of Rs. 50,000 with two solvent sureties each for Rs. 50,000, reporting every Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday, and not entering the police station limits.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA
MONDAY, THE 7TH JUNE 2010 / 17TH JYAISTHA 1932
Bail Appl..No. 3255 of 2010() ----------------------------(CRIME NO.212/2010 OF NEDUPUZHA POLICE STATION)
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED / / IN CRMP 2591/2010 IN CRMP.2825/2010 of J.M.F.C.-II,THRISSUR
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2
SHINU, S/O.SREENIVASAN, VADAKKUMPARAMBIL HOUSE, PUTHOORKARA DESOM, PULLAZHI VILLAGE, THRISSUR.
BY ADV. SRI.M.B.PRAJITH
RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT
- STATE REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for bail under Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Whether the stringent conditions proposed by the Public Prosecutor should be imposed on the grant of bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SHINU, S/O.SREENIVASAN
- respondent
STATE
- respondent
THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NEDUPUZHA POLICE STATION
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court