Samad v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Discussed bail appeal in SC/ST atrocity case. Court held Section 18 of Act bars anticipatory bail. Petition dismissed as not fit case.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail application dismissed as not fit case and barred under Section 18 of SC/ST (PA) Act.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA
MONDAY, THE 14TH JUNE 2010 / 24TH JYAISTHA 1932
Bail Appl..No. 2770 of 2010()
----------------------------(CRIME NO.269/2010 OF BEKAL POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD DISTRICT)
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NOS. 2, 3 & 5
- SAMAD, AGED 19 YEARS, S/O.MOHAMMED SALI, BEKAL KOTTAKUNNU, PALLIKARA P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
- ROUNAK, AGED 20 YEARS, S/O.MUNEER BEKAL KOTTAKUNNU, PALLIKARA, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
- GAFOOR, AGED 19 YEARS, S/O.K.B.MOHAMMED, BEKAL, PALLIKARA, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN SRI.JOHNY THOMAS
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in a case involving SC/ST atrocity under Section 3(i)(xi).
Whether Section 18 of the SC/ST (Preventive Atrocity) Act bars the grant of anticipatory bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SAMAD / ROUNAK / GAFOOR
- respondent
STATE
Coram
K.HEMA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court