Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case. Court refused anticipatory bail, directing surrender for interrogation, followed by consideration for regular bail before a Magistrate.
Directed surrender for interrogation by IO on 05-04-2010 or 06-04-2010, followed by consideration for regular bail before Magistrate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2010 / 3RD CHAITHRA 1932
Bail Appl..No. 250 of 2010()
[ CRIME NO. 2/10 OF TALIPARAMBA POLICE STATION, KANNUR DIST] -----------------------------------------------------------
PETITIONER/ACCUSED ---------------------------------VINEETH.P., S/O.KARUNAKARAN, AGED 22 YEARS, PARAYANTHIL HOUSE, KAVUNKAL, PATTUVAM AMSOM, KANNUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.V.A.SATHEESH SRI.V.T.MADHAVANUNNI
RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT --------------------------------------------STATE, THROUGH THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER TALIPARAMBA POLICE STATION,KANNUR DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.2/10 OF TALIPARAMBA POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT) REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR. C.M. NAZAR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
PKK
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
Bail Application No. 250 of 2010
----------------------------------
Dated this the 24th day of March, 2010.
O R D E R
Petitioner who is the accused in Crime No.2 of 2010 of Taliparamba Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 456, 153 and 435 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail.
This petition is disposed of as above.
Dated this the 24th day of March, 2010.
V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.
rv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in a case involving offences punishable under Sections 456, 153 and 435 I.P.C.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Vineeth P.
State
V. Ramkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
