Anthikkavil Abdul Rafeeque v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner accused under Sections 376 and 313 IPC sought anticipatory bail. Court rejected anticipatory bail but permitted surrender for interrogation between 18.03.2010 and 20.03.2010 for subsequent Magistrate consideration.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of; surrender permitted between 18.03.2010 and 20.03.2010; Magistrate to consider regular bail application thereafter.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 16TH MARCH 2010 / 25TH PHALGUNA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 1481 of 2010() ----------------------------CRIME NO.38/2010 OF KARIPPOOR POLICE STATION , MALAPPURAM DISTRICT ....................
PETITIONER/ACCUSED
-------------------------------------ANTHIKKAVIL ABDUL RAFEEQUE, S/O.MOHAMMED KUTTY, KARATTU HOUSE, KUMINIPPARAMBU P.O., KARIPPOOR, KONDOTTY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.P.SAMSUDIN
RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARIPPOOR THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.TEKCHAND
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
Bail Application No. 1481 of 2010
----------------------------------
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail can be granted in offences under Sections 376 and 313 IPC
Whether petitioner can be permitted to surrender for interrogation before regular bail is considered
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ANTHIKKAVIL ABDUL RAFEEQUE
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
V. RAMKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court