The Kerala High Court rejected the application for anticipatory bail in a case involving possession of coloured arrack. The court directed the accused to surrender and seek regular bail within two weeks.
Application dismissed; petitioner directed to surrender within two weeks to apply for regular bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2010 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 1214 of 2010() ----------------------------(CRIME NO.10 OF 2010 OF MAVELIKKARA EXCISE RANGE) PETITIONERS/ACCUSED: ---------------------------------------SYMALA, AGED 37 YEARS, W/O.VIJAYAN, AMRITHA BHAVAN, EAREZHATHEKKUM MURI, PERINGALA VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.V.ANIL (K/1480/98)
RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: --------------------------STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. (CRIME NO.10 OF 2010 OF MAVELIKKARA EXCISE RANGE).
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.M.KAMAPPU
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
Bail Application No. 1214 of 2010
DATED: 6/4/2010
O R D E R
In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the accused in Crime No. No. 10/2010 of Mavelikkara Excise Range for an offence punishable under section 8(1)(2) of the Abkari Act for allegedly having been found in possession of coloured arrack, seeks anticipatory Bail.
With the above observation this Application is disposed of .
dpk
V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in a case involving grave offence under section 8(1)(2) of the Abkari Act.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sukumari v. State of KeralaReferred¶12
Sukumari v. State of Kerala - 2001 (1) KLT 22
2 provisions across 2 enactments
SYMALA
STATE OF KERALA
V.RAMKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
V.RAMKUMAR
Parties & counsel
