Beepathukutty v. Ava Umma
Case brief
What is this about?
Valuing a dispute over land partition and possession following an order in an appeal for specific performance of an alleged contract between legal representatives.
What did the court decide?
The money decree is set aside; respondents execute an assignment deed for 50 cents; appellants restore possession of 70 cents and 20 cents.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN
MONDAY, THE 2ND AUGUST 2010 / 11TH SRAVANA 1932
AS.No. 742 of 1995(C)
-------------------------------OS.436/1990 of ADDL.SUB COURT, PALAKKAD ....................
APPELLANT(S): LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF PLAINTIFF
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. BEEPATHUKUTTY, W/O. ABUBACKER, AGED 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT THENODE HOUSE, VAVULLIAPURAM AMSOM AND DESOM, ALATHUR TALUK.
2. ABUBACKER, S/O. VELLATHIAYI ALIAS VEERANKUTTY, THENODE HOUSE, VAVULLIAPURAM AMSOM AND DESOM, ALATHUR TALUK.
3. SHAJITHA, W/O. LATE ANFARDHEEN, AGED 24 YEARS, THENODE HOUSE, VAVULLIAPURAM AMSOM AND DESOM , ALATHUR TALUK.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the money decree granted by the subordinate judge should be set aside and replaced with specific performance of a compromise regarding land possession.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
BEEPATHUKUTTY AND OTHERS
- respondent
AVA UMMA AND SARAHA UMMA
Coram
M.N. Krishnan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court