Petitioner filed a writ petition which the court found to be infructuous and dismissed the matter without engaging with the underlying substantive claim.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
FRIDAY, THE 16TH OCTOBER 2009 / 24TH ASWINA 1931
WP(C).No. 9949 of 2009(K)
PETITIONER(S):
RAJAMMA M.PANICKER, PUTHENVILA VEEDU, KUNDARA, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN
RESPONDENT(S):
ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS FOR R3
G.P. SHRI.MUHAMMED HASHIM.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
S.SIRI JAGAN, J.
==================
W.P(C).No.9949 of 2009
==================
Dated this the 16th day of October, 2009
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition
has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
Sd/-
sdk+
S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
///True copy///
P.A. to Judge
RAJAMMA M.PANICKER
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLLAM
S.SIRI JAGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
