Writ petition filed by permit holder aggrieved by indefinite adjournment of renewal application by RTA. Court disposed of petition directing RTA to pass final orders on the application within three months.
Directed the RTA to pass final orders on the petitioner's application for renewal of permit within 3 months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
THURSDAY, THE 19TH MARCH 2009 / 28TH PHALGUNA 1930
WP(C).No. 8805 of 2009(U)
PETITIONER(S):
V.J.RADHAMANI, ROHINI HOUSE,VAZHITHALA, THODUPUZHA.
BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON
RESPONDENT(S):
BY GOV. PLEADER SRI. P.. SANTHOSH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC,J.
W.P.(C).No.8805 OF 2009
Dated this the 19th day of March, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Ext.P2 is the proceedings of the first respondent adjourning the application made by the petitioner for renewal of his regular permit on the ground that the permit in question
is covered by the draft notification dated 15.9.2008. It is aggrieved by the indefinite adjournment the writ petition is
filed.
(ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE
vi/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether indefinite adjournment of a permit renewal application requires the court to direct the authority to pass final orders.
Whether the petitioner is aggrieved by the indefinite adjournment of their application for renewal of regular permit.
V.J.RADHAMANI
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
