Dismissed
Prasad v. Pankajakshan N
Kerala HCWP(C)/39/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 7TH JULY 2009 / 16TH ASHADHA 1931
WP(C).No. 39 of 2009(D)
---------------------------------OS.NO.341/2006 OF MUSNIFF COURT,ADOOR. ....................
PETITIONER: -------------------
PRASAD, PRASANTH BHAVAN, POOMARUTHIKKUZHI, KALANJOOR VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK.
BY ADV. MR.M.NARENDRA KUMAR.
RESPONDENT: ----------------------
PANKAJAKSHAN.N, VRINDAVANAM, POOMARUTHIKKUZAHY, KALANJOOR VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK.
BY ADVS. MR. K.SHAJ, MR.SAJJU.S, SMT.REGY ELIZABETH THOMAS.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/07/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
prv.
S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.
W.P.(C) No. 39 OF 2009 D
Dated this the 7th day of July, 2009
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that memo
has been filed and the petition is not pressed. The writ petition is
dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/- (S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE)
aks
// True Copy //
P.A. to Judge
Prasad
Pankajakshan. N
S.S. Satheesachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court