T.v.Valsamma v. T.K.Sukumaran
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner challenged an order dismissing an amendment to the written statement in a civil suit. This court found the amendment belated and intended to introduce a new case, dismissing the writ petition.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 18TH BHADRA 1931
WP(C).No. 32620 of 2008(G)
-------------------------OS.49/2005 of PRL.MUNSIFF COURT, CHERTHALA
PETITIONER(S):
---------------
T.V.VALSAMMA, W/O.P.A.BAHULEYAN, ELLIKKAL VEETTIL, MUHAMMA P.O., CHARAMANGALAM MURI OF THANNERMUKKAM SOUTH VILLAGE.
BY ADV. DR.V.N.SANKARJEE
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the learned Munsiff was justified in dismissing the application to amend the written statement as belated and for introducing a new case.
Whether the order passed by the Munsiff Court in IA No.3304/2006 calling for records in Civil WP(C).No.32620 of 2008 was erroneous or arbitrary.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T.V. VALSAMMA
- respondent
T.K. SUKUMARAN
Coram
S.S. SATHIYANARAYANA IYER
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court