Yavis v. Antony
Case brief
What is this about?
The court closed the writ petitions as unnecessary in the light of previously decided C.R.Ps, without elaborating on the merits.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI
WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DECEMBER 2009 / 25TH AGRAHAYANA 1931
WP(C).No. 20846 of 2004(F)
-------------------------OS.719/1993 of I ADDL.SUB COURT, THRISSUR ....................
PETITIONER(S):
---------------
1. DAVIS, S/O. KUTTIKKAT OUSEPH, PAZHUVIL VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
2. PAUL, S/O. OUSEPH IN -DO- IN -DO-.
3. FRANCIS, S/O. OUSEPH, IN -DO- -DO-.
4. CICILY, W/O. KUKKIKKAT JACOB, IN
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
DAVIS, S/O. KUTTIKKAT OUSEPH, PAZHUVIL VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
- petitioner
PAUL, S/O. OUSEPH
- petitioner
FRANCIS, S/O. OUSEPH
- petitioner
CICILY, W/O. KUKKIKKAT JACOB
- petitioner
THANKACHAN, S/O. KUTTIKKAT OUSEPH
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court