Ammad v. Kunhami
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court dismissed the writ petition which was not pressed by the petitioner's counsel during the hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 2ND JULY 2009 / 11TH ASHADHA 1931
WP(C).No. 20403 of 2003(D)
-----------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S): -----------------------
AMMAD, S/O. PATHU @ FATHIMA, AGED 65 YEARS, TRADER, KAKKADAN PANOLI HOUSE, EDACHERI AMSOM, DESOM, EDACHERI NORTH POST, VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. MR.B.KRISHNAN, MR.R.PARTHASARATHY.
RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------------
1. KUNHAMI, D/O. PATHU, AGED 55 YEARS, EDACHERI AMSOM, DESOM, EDACHERI NORTH POST, VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
2. SISTER MARIYAM, AGED 50 YEARS, PARAMBATH HOUSE, EDACHERI AMSOM, DESOM, P.O. EDACHERI NORTH, VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ammad, S/o. Pathu @ Fathima
- respondent
Kunhami, D/o. Pathu
- respondent
Sister Mariyam
- respondent
Brother Moidu
- respondent
Son Sattar
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court