The High Court of Kerala disposed of this identical writ petition by directing that the directions issued in an earlier, related writ petition (No. 16810 of 2009) delivered on the same day shall apply to this case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 10TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 19TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 19673 of 2009(D) -------------------------PETITIONER(S): ---------------
M/S.KPL OIL MILLS PVT. LTD., P.B.NO.2, KODUNGALLUR ROAD, IRINJALAKUDA, KERALA 680 121, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, MR.JOSE JOHN.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSEPH KODIANTHARA SRI.TERRY V.JAMES SRI.B.J.JOHN PRAKASH
RESPONDENT(S): ---------------
ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM THOMAS, CGC FOR R1-5
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.
W.P.(C) No. 19673 OF 2009
Dated this the 10th day of November, 2009
J U D G M E N T
The issues raised in this writ petition are similar to the issue raised in W.P.(C) No. 16810 of 2009, I have by judgment delivered today disposed of W.P.(C) No. 16810 of 2009 with certain directions. This writ petition raising identical issues is therefore disposed of with the observation that the directions issued by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 16810 of 2009 will govern this case also.
P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE
vps
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.(C) No. 16810 of 2009Affirmed¶20
M/s.KPL Oil Mills Pvt. Ltd.
Union of India
Central Board of Excise & Customs
Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs
Asst. Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Thrissur Division
Superintendent of Central Excise, Irinjalakkuda Range
P.N. Ravindran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
