Petitioner challenged unnecessary adjournment of his regular permit application for a new vehicle on the route Koottikkada-Karicod. The single bench directed the R.T.A. to take a decision as early as possible in the next meeting.
Direction to 1st respondent to take a decision on petitioner's regular permit application on or before next R.T.A. meeting.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI
TUESDAY, THE 12TH MAY 2009 / 22ND VAISAKHA 1931
WP(C).No. 13136 of 2009(J)
PETITIONER:
NAUSHAD, THANNOLIL KIZHAKKATHIL, ERAVIPURAM, THATTAMALA, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.T.P.SAJAN SRI.M.MOHAMED NAVAZ
RESPONDENTS:
BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P. NANDAKUMAR
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
V.GIRI,J.
W.P ( C) No.13136 of 2009
Dated this the 12th May,2009
J U D G M E N T
Petitioner's application for regular permit in respect of a new vehicle on the route Koottikkada- Karicod is pending as Exhibit-P1. Petitioner complains of unnecessary adjournment of a consideration of the application.
Copy of the writ petition shall be produced along with a copy of the judgment by the petitioner before the 1st respondent, for compliance.
(V.GIRI,JUDGE)
ma
2
3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the 1st respondent to decide on the petitioner's application for regular permit.
NAUSHAD, THANNOLIL KIZHAKKATHIL, ERAVIPURAM, THATTAMALA, KOLLAM
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLLAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
THE SECRETARY, R.T.A., KOLLAM
V. GIRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
