R.Balan v. Karuvan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed the Second Appeal filed by R.Balan and others for default as the counsel for the appellants was absent and there was no representation on their behalf when the matter was heard for final hearing.
What did the court decide?
The Second Appeal was dismissed for default.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 6TH JUNE 2008 / 16TH JYAISHTA 1930
SA.No.205 of 1995(G)
-------------------------AS.75/1988 of DISTRICT COURT, KASARAGOD OS.101/1974 of SUB COURT, KASARAGOD
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS 3 TO 8/L.Rs OF PLAINTIFF:
----------------------------------------------------------------
1. R.BALAN, THAYATH HOUSE, BEACH ROAD, NEAR BHAGAVATHI TEMPLE, KOTIKULAM, P.O. BEKAL, HODRUG TALUK.
2. KALLYANI, -DO- -DO-
3. MEENAKSHI, -DO- -DO-
4. KAMALAKSHI, -DO- -DO-
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R.BALAN AND OTHERS
- respondent
KARUVAN AND OTHERS
Coram
K.P.BALACHANDRAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court