Second appeal dismissed for default. The court noted that despite notices to the second respondent, no steps were taken and no representation appeared on behalf of the appellant on the date of disposal.
Second appeal dismissed for default due to non-appearance and lack of representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 5TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 16TH MAGHA 1930
SA.No. 202 of 1997(G)
AS.51/1990 of SUB COURT, HOSDRUG OS.64/1987 of MUNSIFF COURT, HOSDRUG
APPELLANT/2ND RESPONDENT/2ND DEFENDANT:-
KANNOTH CHANDRAN, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. KRISHNAN & NARAYANI, HINDU, RESIDING AT RAMANAGAR IN AJANOOR VILLAGE OF HOSDURG TALU, POST ANANDASHRAM.
BY ADV. MR.G.PRABHAKARAN
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFFS/1ST DEFENDANT:-
MR.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ADV. MS.M.M.TEENA
THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
IN VIEW OF THE DISMISSAL OF C.M.P. 562/97, THIS SECOND APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
05.02.2009
sd/- V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.
V. RAMKUMAR , J.
==========================
R.S.A. No. 202 of 1997
========================== Dated this the 5th day of February, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Even though sufficient opportunities have been given to the appellant to take out notice to the 2nd respondent, no steps have been taken so far. Even when the case came up today in the disposal list, there was no representation on behalf of the
appellant. The Second Appeal is accordingly dismissed for default.
Dated this the 5th day of February, 2009.
V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.
rv
V. RAMKUMAR, J
S.A. No. 202 of 1997
5th day of February, 2009.
JUDGMENT
KANNOTH CHANDRAN
CHEYYOM VALAPPIL GOPALAN
P. NARAYANAN
V.RAMKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
