The High Court dismissed the review petition filed by a retired school assistant challenging the recovery of pension dues, finding no substantial ground for review as the raised contentions were already adjudicated in the impugned judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
TUESDAY, THE 8TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 17TH BHADRA 1931
RP.No. 741 of 2009() -------------------(Against WP(c).No.168/07 dated 24.10.2008)
REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER
M.A.SANTHAKUMARI, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT(RETIRED) HAMADANIYA UP.SCHOOL, PO,AZHIKODE-680 666 KODUNGALLUR(RESIDING AT KONETHAZHATH HOUSE, EDAVANAKKAD, ERNAKULAM-682 504.
BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS
BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. SMITHA
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC,J.
R.P.No.741/09 in W.P.(C).No.168/2007
Dated this the 8th day of September, 2009.
O R D E R
The writ petition was dismissed by judgment dated 24.10.2008. Subsequently, though a writ appeal was filed as W.A. No.175/09, that was withdrawn with liberty to file a review petition and accordingly this review petition is filed.
Review Petition fails and is dismissed.
(ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE
vi/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court was in law bound to allow the review petition.
M.A. SANTHAKUMARI
THE STATE OF KERALA
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
