Review petition by respondents 4 & 5 in the writ petition seeking hearng by the Government before passing orders. Court closed review noting State had already complied and matter referred to Vigilance.
None. Review petition closed. Petitioners to seek remedies against Government order if aggrieved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
FRIDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2009 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1931
RP.No. 376 of 2009(Y)
--------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.36119/2008
REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS 4 & 5 IN WPC.
BY ADV. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 IN WPC:
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
R.P.No.376 of 2009 in W.P.(C.) No.36119 of 2008
Dated, this the 3rd day of April, 2009
O R D E R
The review is sought by respondents 4 & 5 in the writ petition,
and the clarification sought is that before orders are passed as directed in the judgment, they should also be heard by the 1st respondent, Government.
Therefore, the review petition is closed, clarifying that if the petitioners are aggrieved, they may seek remedies against the order passed by the Government.
(ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE)
jg
MOHAMMED KUNJU
K.M.SULAIMAN KUNJU
STATE OF KERALA
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
