M.K.Ramachandran v. M.K.Pushpa
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed the appeal against the dismissal of a suit due to non-payment of balance court fee, granting the appellant two weeks to pay the fee and costs, subject to a condition.
What did the court decide?
Appeal allowed; judgment of lower court set aside; appellant given two weeks to pay balance court fee and costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS MONDAY, THE 12TH OCTOBER 2009 / 20TH ASWINA 1931
RFA.No. 33 of 2009 D
-------------------OS.195/2007 of PRL. SUB COURT, THALASSERY ....................
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
--------------------------------M.K.RAMACHANDRAN, S/O.LATE KUNHIKANNAN, 77 YEARS, DOCTOR, R/AT.CHITHANYA, PUTHIYAPARAMBA, PO.ALAVIL, KANNUR.
BY ADV. SRI.V.RAMKUMAR NAMBIAR
RESPONDENT(S)/DEFENDANT: ------------------------------------------M.K.PUSHPA, D/O.LATE KUNHIKANNAN, 61 YEARS, R/AT.DOOR NO.334, 1ST CROSS ROAD, VRINDHAVAN EXTENSION, MYSORE.
BY ADV. SRI.C.E.UNNIKRISHNAN.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K. M. JOSEPH & M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant should be afforded an opportunity to contest the appeal after paying the balance court fee and costs.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M.K.RAMACHANDRAN
- respondent
M.K.PUSHPA
Coram
K.M. JOSEPH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court