Kumaran v. Francis
Case brief
What is this about?
An original petition in O.P.No. 22870 of 1999(V) filed by Kumanan was finally heard. Tenants appeared as petitioners. No one appeared for the petitioner. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
TUESDAY, THE 20TH OCTOBER 2009 / 28TH ASWINA 1931 OP.No. 22870 of 1999(V) ----------------------PETITIONER(S): ---------------
KUMARAN S/O.MADHAVAN, HOTEL BUSINESS, KARAMULLIL HOUSE, KAROOR, PONADU KARA, LALAM VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.THOMAS KOSHY SRI.RAKESH S.PILLAI SRI.M.J.JOSEPH
- RESPONDENT(S):
- FRANCIS, S/O.JOSEPH, MILATARY SERVICE, NEELAMKAVIL VEETTIL, ARUNAPURAM KARA, PULIYANNOOR VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
- MARIAMMA, W/O.FRANCIS, HOUSE WIFE, -DO3. SEBASTIAN, S/O.SKARIA, VYPPINAYIL HOUSE, -DO-
- VALSAMMA, W/O.SEBASTIAN, -DO5. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM. 6. DY. SUPDT. OF POLICE, PALA. 7. S.I. OF POLICE, PALA. 8. TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, MEENACHIL TALUK, PALA.
- VILLAGE OFFICER, LALAM VILLAGE, PALA. 10. TALUK SURVEYOR, MEENACHIL TALUK, PALA.
- VISWANATH SINHA, DIST. COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
KUMARAN
- respondent
FRANCIS
- respondent
MARIAMMA
- respondent
SEBASTIAN
- respondent
VALSAMMA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court