on 17.12.2008, this Court directed the second respondent to make a report after the spot inspection. Accordingly, the second respondent has filed an affidavit dated 1.7.2009 wherein he had stated that he had personally visited the spot on 10.6.2009 along with the Taluk Surveyor and also stated that he had perused the revenue records pertaining to the properties and on such perusal of records, according to him, the properties were comprised in Sy.Nos. 224/16,224/17 and 225/1. Regarding these aspects, there is no dispute. He had further reported that the Kavungal Kizhakku stake line plan fixed from taking measurements from the point where line measuring 27.9 and 10.5 intersects and he had verified the present location of the stake nets and stated that there is no violation of the licence. It is also reported that during his inspection, it has been ascertained that shifting of the stake nets towards the shore would cause obstruction to the National Water Way and therefore, shifting of the line towards the shore is undesirable.