Sajimon v. Indulekha
Case brief
What is this about?
Matrimonial appeal set aside based on accepted submission that all outstanding disputes have been settled and respondent received full satisfaction of impugned order.
What did the court decide?
This appeal is allowed as agreed. The impugned order is set aside.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI FRIDAY, THE 23RD OCTOBER 2009 / 1ST KARTHIKA 1931 Mat.Appeal.No. 403 of 2009(F) ---------------------------OP.1039/2007 of FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM ....................
APPELLANTS/ RESPONDENTS:
- SAJIMON, S/O. PADMANABHA PILLAI, POOVAKULATH HOUSE, KARIMPANI P.O., MATTAKKARA, AKAAKUNNAM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM.
- PADMANABHA PILLAI, POOVAKULATH HOUSE, KARIPANAI P.O., MATTAKKARA, AKALAKUNNAM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM.
- BHAGEERATHIAMMA, POOVAKULATH HOUSE, KARIMPANI P.O.,MATTAKKARA, AKALAKUNNAM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE
RESPONDENT: PETITIONER
INDULEKHA, D/O. THULASIDASAN PILLAI, LAL BHAVAN, CHENNAMKARI EAST P.O., KAVALAM, ALAPPUZHA DIST. ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.SAIJO HASSAN
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SAJIMON
- appellant
PADMANABHA PILLAI
- appellant
BHAGEERATHIAMMA
- respondent
INDULEKHA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court