Mary v. V.M. George
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Kerala dismissed a revision petition seeking to revive a suit dismissed for non-prosecution after 15 years, holding it was not a fit case to show indulgence.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 16TH JULY 2009 / 25TH ASHADHA 1931
CRP.No. 1999 of 2001()
----------------------------------CMA.2/2001 of D.C. & SESSIONS COURT, ERNAKULAM OS.589/1994 of PRL.M.C.,ERNAKULAM
REVISION PETITIONER(S): APPELLANTS:PLAINTIFFS:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. MARY, W/O.EASTY, AGED 59 YEARS, KIZHAKKECHERUKUTTU HOUSE, PERUMPADAPPU.
2. BABY, W/O.JOSEPH, AGED 61 YEARS, KURUPPASSERY HOUSE, PERUMPADAPPU.
3. CICILY, W/O. ANTHAPPAN, AGED 66 YEARS, MUTTUNGAL HUOSE, CHERIAKADAVU.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court can show indulgence to revive a suit dismissed for non-prosecution due to laches and wilful default of the plaintiff after 15 years?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mary, W/o. Easty
- petitioner
Baby, W/o. Joseph
- petitioner
Cicily, W/o. Anthappan
- petitioner
Reji, W/o. Joseph
- petitioner
V.J. Peter, S/o. Late Joseph
- petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court