Veeravu v. Yasoda
Case brief
What is this about?
This Court dismissed a revision petition challenging the setting aside of an ex parte decree in a suit for specific performance, while directing the trial court to prioritize hearing and expedite the trial before Christmas vacation.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed; directed trial court to prioritize suit and dispose of it expeditiously before Christmas vacation.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 13TH JULY 2009 / 22ND ASHADHA 1931
CRP.No. 125 of 2009(B)
---------------------------------
REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT IN I.A – PLAINTIFF IN SUIT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VEERAVU , S/O.ILLIKKOTTIL SAIDALI, KUMARANELLUR VILLAGE AND DESOM, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. MR.K.JAYAKUMAR, MR.P.B.KRISHNAN, SMT.GEETHA P.MENON, MR.P.M.NEELAKANDAN.
RESPONDENTS:
------------------------
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Sub Judge's discretionary order setting aside an ex parte decree on terms.
Whether the revision petition against the impugned order should be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Veeravu
- respondent
Yasoda
Coram
S.S.Satheesachandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court