Vs
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed a criminal revision petition challenging an order refusing discharge under Section 239 CrPC. The court held it unnecessary to examine substantive contentions as the petitioner may raise them during the trial.
What did the court decide?
Revision petition dismissed; leave to raise contentions in trial court reserved.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH
FRIDAY, THE 12TH JUNE 2009 / 22ND JYAISHTA 1931
CRL.REV.PET.NO. 1136 OF 2003()
---------------------------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER IN CMP.484/2003 IN CC.742/2000 OF JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, VARKALA
REVN. PETITIONER(S) - ACCUSED:
----------------------------------------------
N.ANGRAMUTHU, NO.5-99, MARIAMMAN COVIL STREET, PEERUMEDU, ANNA NAGAR, COIMBATHOOR.
BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV
RESPONDENT(S) - COMPLAINANT:
---------------------------------------------
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition challenging the discharge refusal under Section 239 CrPC should be dismissed without prejudice to the petitioner's right to raise arguments during trial.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N. Angramuthu
- respondent
State of Kerala
Coram
Thomas P. Joseph
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court