Raheel v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner accused under Section 138 NI Act sought bail via CrPC 482 after surrendering. Court held Magistrate must act promptly upon surrender and no bail direction was warranted.
What did the court decide?
Petition is dismissed. No direction to release petitioner on bail.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
MONDAY, THE 15TH JUNE 2009 / 25TH JYAISHTA 1931
Crl.MC.No. 1927 of 2009() ------------------------ST.243/2005 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-III, TRIVANDRUM ....................
PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED:
-----------------------------------------
RAHEEL, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.HABEEB MOHAMMED, BABU VILASOM, KULAMUTTOM, MOONGODU, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. MR.M.TRIPTEN
RESPONDENT(S): STATE & COMPLAINANT:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted when the accused surrenders and the Magistrate has already cancelled bail due to failure to appear
Whether this court should issue direction to the Magistrate to grant bail upon surrender
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAHEEL
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
- respondent
LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court