The Court dismissed two connected criminal appeals because they were not pressed by the counsel for the appellant during the hearing held on 7 April 2009.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 7TH APRIL 2009 / 17TH CHAITHRA 1931
CRL.A.No. 924 of 2003(C)
-----------------------------------CC.NO. 126/2002 OF JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-III, KANNUR
APPELLANT/COMPLAINANT:
-----------------------------------------
M.P.NARAYANAN, S/O. LATE RAMAN, EAST EDANAD, KUNHIMANGALAM AMSOM, P.O. EDAT, KANNUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. MR.V.N.RAMESAN NAMBISAN.
RESPONDENT/ ACCUSED:
--------------------------------------
1. C.P.AJAYAKUMAR, ADVOCATE, TALIPARAMBA, POST TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT.
2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. PUSHPALATHA M.K, R1 BY ADV. MR.P.NARAYANAN.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/04/2009, ALONG WITH CRL.A NO.925/2003,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
prv.
S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.
CRL.APPEAL.NOS.924 & 925 OF 2003 (B)
----------------------------------Dated this the 7th day of April, 2009
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appeals are not pressed. Hence, these appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN JUDGE
prp
S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.
CRL.A.NOS.924 & 925 OF 2003 (B)
J U D G M E N T
7the April, 2009
M.P. Narayanan
State of Kerala
C.P. Ajayakumar
S.S. Satheesachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
