V.v.Sunny v. Ashok Kumar Singha
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt of court case regarding professional remuneration, the petitioners lawyer submitted the amount disbursed. The Judge sought further enquiry on the claim and closed the contempt of court case.
What did the court decide?
Contempt of Court case closed. Petitioner's right to seek appropriate remedy for claimed remuneration preserved.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI
MONDAY, THE 3RD AUGUST 2009 / 12TH SRAVANA 1931
Con.Case(C).No. 811 of 2009(S) -----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.12733/2008 Dated 27/11/2008 ....................
PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER
V.V.SUNNY, S/O. VARGHESE, AGED 44 YRS, VALANKUZHIYIL HOUSE, ARAKKULAM P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.GEORGEKUTTY MATHEW
RESPONDENT(S): R2 -----------------
ASHOK KUMAR SINGHA, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, IDUKKI.
BY GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.V.SUNNY
- respondent
ASHOK KUMAR SINGHA
Coram
V. GIRI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court