Jose Maveli v. Thomas Mathew
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a contempt case challenging the constitution of Child Welfare Committees. The respondent admitted Committees were constituted andinous actions. The case was closed without adjudicating earlier orders' legality.
What did the court decide?
Closed without prejudice to the right of any person to challenge the constitution of Child Welfare Committees before the competent authority.