A.Chandrasekharan Nair v. Mr.Johnson K.George
Case brief
What is this about?
Proceeding in contempt of court closed without addressing merits as petitioner aggrieved by compliance order must seek appropriate remedies separately.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
FRIDAY, THE 23RD JANUARY 2009 / 3RD MAGHA 1930
Con.Case(C).No. 1730 of 2008(S)
---------------------------------------------
AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/IN WPC.20323/2008 Dated 23/07/2008
PETITIONER(S): --------------------
A.CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O.OAPPUKUTTAN NAIR, 16, AMBADY, N.P.P. NAGAR, PEROORKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. DR.K.P.SATHEESAN SRI.K.K.GOPINATHAN NAIR SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM)
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT
-------------------------------------------
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt of court proceeding should be closed pending appropriate remedies against the compliance order.
Whether to express opinion on merits of the compliance order.
What procedural steps should be taken if the petitioner remains aggrieved by the order dated 05/12/2008.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A Chandrasekharan Nair
- respondent
Mr Johnson K. George
Coram
ANTONY DOMINIC
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court