In a contempt proceeding arising from an advertisement issue, the Court disposes of the case by closing it due to an affidavit of apology and a promise to forgo charges.
Contempt case is closed on account of apology and promise to forgo charges.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
THURSDAY, THE 8TH JANUARY 2009 / 18TH POUSHA 1930
Con.Case(C).No. 1702 of 2008(S) ------------------------------(W.P.(C).No. 768/2008)
PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN WPC
RAJAN THAMBI, S/O.KUNJU PILLAI, SHEELA NIVAS, NEAR B.M.S. ATTINGAL P.O. ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.M.TRIPTEN
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS IN WPC
ADV. SRI.K.G.RADHAKRISHAN,SC,TVM.DIST.CO.OP. FOR R1
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
S.SIRI JAGAN, J.
==================
C.C.O.No.1702 of 2008
==================
Dated this the 8th day of January, 2009
J U D G M E N T
In view of the affidavit submitted apologising for the conduct of the respondents and the promise to forgo the advertisement charges, I am not inclined to take further proceedings in this contempt case. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed.
Sd/-
sdk+
S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
///True copy///
P.A. to Judge
RAJAN THAMBI
KARUNAKARAN NAIR
S. SIRI JAGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
