Jaleel v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed as infructuous. No substantive reasoning or citation of precedent provided in the brief order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH MARCH 2009 / 4TH CHAITHRA 1931
Bail Appl..No. 637 of 2009() ---------------------------------------(CRIME NO.364/08 OF ERUMAPPETTY POLICE STATION)
PETITIONER(S): 2ND ACCUSED:
--------------------------------------------------
JALEEL, S/O.SAINUDHEEN, PUTHUVEL VILA VEEDU, DECENT MUKKU, NAVAIKKULAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS. MR.R.T.PRADEEP, MR.V.VIJULAL.
RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------------
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR. K.S.SIVAKUMAR
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JALEEL, S/O. SAINUDHEEN
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
V. RAMKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court