Disposed

Rinto v. the State of Kerala

Kerala HC12 Mar 2009Bail Appl./418/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court refused anticipatory bail in a case involving IPC offences and the Arms Act. Instead, petitioners were directed to surrender for interrogation on 17-19 March 2009, followed by production before a Magistrate for bail consideration.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to surrender for interrogation on 17-19-3-2009 and then produced before Magistrate for bail consideration.

Rinto Vs the State of Kerala — Anticipatory Bail | Kerala HC (2009)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 12TH MARCH 2009 / 21ST PHALGUNA 1930

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 418 of 2009()

¶6

---------------------------CRIME NO. 721 OF 2008 OF PUDUKKAD POLICE STATION

¶7

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS. 1 & 3

¶8

¶9

RINTO, S/O.KOCHAPPU, CHERUVALKARAN HOUSE, PALLIKKUNNU, KALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

¶10

RADHAKRISHNAN @ KUNHANDI, KOTTAYI, KALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

¶11

BY ADV. SRI.O.V.MANIPRASAD

¶12

RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT

¶13

¶14

THE STATE OF KERALA, (THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUDUKKAD POLICE STATION, CRIME NO.721/2008) REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶15

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZE

¶16

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶17

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶18

*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * B.A. NO. 418 of 2009**

¶19

*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 12-03-2009**

¶20

ORDER

¶21

Petitioners who are accused Nos. 1 and 3 in Crime No. 721 of 2008 of Pudukkad Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 341 and 427 read withSec. 149 I.P.C. and Sec. 27 of the Arms Act, seek anticipatory bail.

¶22

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

¶23

Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioners to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have their application for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioners shall surrender before the investigating officer on any day between 17-3-2009 and 19-3-2009 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. The petitioners shall thereafter be produced on the same day before the Magistrate who shall consider and dispose of their application for regular bail preferably on the same date on which it is filed.

¶24

This petition is disposed of as above.

¶25

Dated this the 12^th day of March, 2009.

¶26

Sd/- V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

¶27

ani

¶28

/true copy/

¶29

V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE)

¶30

ani

¶31

ani.

Rinto v. the State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rinto v. the State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Vs State of Kerala

Beena Roy and Another Vs State of Kerala Represented by Sub

James Joseph Vs Station House Officer, Peruvannamuzhy

K.Kumaran Vs State of Kerala

Muhammed Haroon Vs State of Kerala

Purushothaman Vs State of Kerala