A bail application challenging the rejection of anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC. The High Court dismissed the plea, holding the petitioner not entitled to the discretionary relief in the given facts.
The Bail Application is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN
THURSDAY, THE 13TH AUGUST 2009 / 22ND SRAVANA 1931
Bail Appl..No. 3930 of 2009
CRIME NO.236 OF 2009 OF VELLIKULANGARA POLICE STATION
PETITIONER: 2ND ACCUSED:
SANDEEP.M.S, S/O.SASI, MANGADAN HOUSE, CHAYPANKUZHI, CHALAKUDI PO,
BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM MATHEW (VETTOOR)
RESPONDENT:
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLIKUNGALARA BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K.T.SANKARAN, J.
B.A. NO. 3930 OF 2009
Dated this the 13th August, 2009
O R D E R
This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the second accused in Crime No.236 of 2009 of Vellikulangara Police Station.
B.A. NO. 3930 OF 2009
:: 2 ::
The Bail Application is accordingly dismissed.
(K.T.SANKARAN) Judge
ahz/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in a case involving alleged illegal sale of arrack and possession of country gun articles.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Sandeep.M.S
State of Kerala
K.T.Sankaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
