The Court closed an anticipatory bail application when the learned public prosecutor submitted that all non-bailable charges were deleted from the proceedings.
The Bail Application was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN TUESDAY, THE 4TH AUGUST 2009 / 13TH SRAVANA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 3778 of 2009() ----------------------------CRIME NO.395/2009 OF RANNI POLICE STATION
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3, 5 & 6
BY ADV. SRI.V.SETHUNATH
RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT/STATE
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K.T.SANKARAN, J.
B.A.No.3778 of 2009
Dated this the 4th day of August, 2009
ORDER
This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It is submitted by the learned public prosecutor that non bailable offences under Sections 326 and 308 IPC were deleted from the crime and at present, no non bailable offence is alleged against the petitioners. This submission is recorded and the Bail Application is closed.
K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE
csl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. should be allowed or closed given the deletion of non-bailable offences.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
VIPIN KUMAR ET ALS.
STATE OF KERALA
K.T.Sankaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
