High Court of Kerala dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Pampady Chandu. The court held that prima facie sufficient materials connect the petitioner with the offense, rendering him not a fit case for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 17TH AUGUST 2009 / 26TH SRAVANA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 3202 of 2009() ----------------------------CRIME NO.19/09 OF MALAPPURAM EXCISE RANGE PETITIONER/ACCUSED: ----------------------------------PAMPADY CHANDU,S/O.KEERAN,AGED 40 YRS, KOTHOLI HOUSE,N.H.COLONY,ARIMPARA.PO, KONDOOTY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.T.V.GEORGE SRI.JIMMY GEORGE (THADATHIL)
RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------------------STATE OF KERALA,REP;BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.P.RAVEENDRA BABU
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K.T.SANKARAN, J.
B.A.No.3202 of 2009
Dated this the 17th day of August, 2009
ORDER
This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.19 of 2009 of Malappuram Excise Range.
Sections 8(1) and (2) and Section 55(g) of the Abkari Act.
is falsely implicated in the case and that there is no material to connect the petitioner with the offence.
BA No.3202/2009
2
In the facts and circumstances mentioned above, the Bail Application is dismissed.
K.T.SANKARAN,
JUDGE
csl
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner falsely implicated in the Offence.
Whether there is a fit case for granting anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in the facts of this case.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pampady Chandu
State of Kerala
KT Sankaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
