S.Abdul Nasar v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Ernakulam dismissed a bail application filed by the accused without any representation from the petitioner on the day of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 15TH JUNE 2009 / 25TH JYAISHTA 1931
Bail Appl..No. 1610 of 2009() ----------------------------CRIME NO.102/2009 OF VALIYATHURA POLICE STATION
PETITIONER/ACCUSED
S.ABDUL NASAR, T.C. 35/489, VIDHYA GARDEN, NO.122, PD NAGAR, VALLAKKADAVU, TRIVANDRUM.
BY ADV. SRI.M.BALAGOVINDAN SRI.T.K.ANANDA PADMANABHAN
RESPONDENT(S): STATE & COMPLAINANT
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K.T.SANKARAN, J.
B.A.No.1610 of 2009
Dated this the 15th day of June, 2009
ORDER
This Bail Application is being posted from 24.3.2009
onwards. On 7.4.2009, 22.5.2009, 28.5.2009 and 10.6.2009,
there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. Today
also, there is no representation for the petitioner.
The Bail Application is accordingly dismissed.
K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE
csl
S.ABDUL NASAR
STATE OF KERALA
COMPLAINANT
K.T.SANKARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court