Allowed

Vijayan v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC1 Apr 2009Bail Appl./1522/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application was disposed of allowing the petitioner accused in a criminal case for illegal possession of arrack to be released on bail. The court granted bail subject to conditions including reporting before the investigating officer, availability for interrogation, and not influencing witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail on executing a bond of Rs. 35,000/- with two solvent sureties each for the same amount.

Vijayan Vs State of Kerala — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Kerala HC (2009)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST APRIL 2009 / 11TH CHAITHRA 1931

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 1522 of 2009() ----------------------------CRIME NO. 8 OF 2009 OF EXCISE RANGE, THIRUPURAM ....................

¶6

PETITIONER/ACCUSED -------------------VIJAYAN, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O CHELLAPPAN NADAR, KARIMPLAVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, THALAYAL DESOM, ATHIYANNOOR VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK.

¶7

BY ADV. SRI.S.MOHAMMED AL RAFI

¶8

RESPONDENT(S): ---------------

¶9

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶10

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S. BREEZE

¶11

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶12

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶13

¶14

Bail Application NO. 1522 of 2009

¶15

- - - - DATED: 01-04-2009

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

In this Petition filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the accused in Crime No. 8 of 2009 of Excise Range, Thirupuram, for an offence punishable under Section 8(i) and (ii) of the Abkari Act for having been found in possession of 4 litres of arrack, seeks his enlargement on bail. Petitioner was arrested on 1-3-2009.

¶18

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶19

Having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of judicial custody undergone by the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs. 35,000/- (Rupees thirty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M.I, Neyyattinkara, and subject to the following conditions: -

¶20

Petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

¶21

Bail Appln. No. 1522 of 2009

¶22

-:2:-

¶23

The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the police till the filing of the final report.

¶24

The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶25

The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶26

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶27

This application is allowed as above.

¶28

Sd/- V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

¶29

ani.

¶30

/true copy/

¶31

Bail Appln. No. 1522 of 2009 -:3:-

Vijayan v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijayan v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rameshan and Others Vs the State of Kerala

Raveendran @ Chiyan Ravi Vs State of Kerala

Sabarinath Vs State of Kerala

N.Mohammedali Vs State of Kerala

Sreenivasan Vs State of Kerala

Muhammed Saneer @ Saneer and Another Vs the C.I.of Police Kodungallur Police Sta