Petitioner sought anticipatory bail alleging kidnapping of his wife's harassment. Public Prosecutor submitted no crime was registered, deeming apprehension unfounded. Court closed the petition without substantive disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2009 / 3RD CHAITHRA 1931
Bail Appl..No. 1257 of 2009() ------------------------
PETITIONER
MANU.V., S/O.VIJAYAN, KOTTAKAYIL, NEERAVIL, PERUNAD P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.P.N.PURUSHOTHAMA KAIMAL
RESPONDENT(S):
STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. K.S. SSIVAKUMAR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
Bail Application No. 1257 of 2009 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated, this the 24th day of March, 2009
ORDER
Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail on the allegation that the Thrissur Police are at his heels at the instance of oneJomon, a friend of the petitioner for allegedly kidnapping his wife Renju.
Recording the submission made by the Public Prosecutor, this petition is closed.
V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE)
ani.
Manu.V.
State of Kerala
V. Ramkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
