Allowed

Maniyan @ Avi Maniyan v. the State of Kerala

Kerala HC7 Apr 2009Bail Appl./1149/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice V. Ramkumar granted bail to the petitioner, the sole accused in a possession case under the Abkari Act, directing his release with sureties and specific conditions including reporting to the investigating officer and not tampering with evidence.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with Rs. 35,000 bond and two sureties; granted on conditions of reporting to IO and not tampering with evidence.

Maniyan @ Avi Maniyan Vs the State of Kerala — Cheque Dishonour | Kerala HC (2009)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 7TH APRIL 2009 / 17TH CHAITHRA 1931

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 1149 of 2009()

¶6

----------------------------CRIME NO.14/2009 OF KAYAMKULAM EXCISE RANGE

¶7

CMP.345/2009 of J.M.F.C.-II, HARIPAD

¶8

PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶9

¶10

MANIYAN @ AVI MANIYAN, S/O.KUTTAPPAN, KUNNUPARAMBIL VEEDU, KANICHANALLOOR MURI, CHEPPAD VILLAGE.

¶11

BY ADV. SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN

¶12

RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT

¶13

¶14

THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶15

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.S.SIVAKUMAR

¶16

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶17

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶18

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bail Application No.1149 of 2009

¶19

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DATED: 7.4.2009

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

In this Petition filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the sole accused in Crime No.14 of 2009 of Kayamkulam Excise Range for an offence punishable under Section 8(1)(2) of the Abkari Act for having been found in possession of 1.3 litres of arrack seeks his enlargement on bail. Petitioner was arrested on 9.2.09.

¶22

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶23

Having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of judicial custody undergone by the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail w.e.f. 15.4.2009 on his executing a bond for Rs. 35,000/- (Rupees thirty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M-II, Haripad and subject to the following conditions: -

¶24

Bail A.No.1149/2009

¶25

-:2:-

¶26

Petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

¶27

The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the police till the filing of the final report.

¶28

The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶29

The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶30

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶31

This application is allowed as above.

¶32

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

¶33

¶34

Bail A.No.1149/2009 -:3:-

Maniyan @ Avi Maniyan v. the State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maniyan @ Avi Maniyan v. the State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijayan Vs State of Kerala

Yousuf and Others Vs State of Kerala

Rasheed Vs State of Kerala

Shaju Vs State of Kerala

Abdul Rasaq Vs State of Kerala

Shahul Hameed and Anothers Vs State of Kerala