Disposed

Ansar Muhammed v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC2 Apr 2009Bail Appl./1114/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court rejected anticipatory bail for accused in 498A and 306 IPC cases. Directed petitioner to surrender for interrogation within specific dates before regular bail application served to Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to surrender to Investigating Officer between 08.04.2009 and 13.4.2009 for interrogation and recovery of material before being produced before Magistrate for bail consideration.

Ansar Muhammed Vs State of Kerala — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Kerala HC (2009)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶3

THURSDAY, THE 2ND APRIL 2009 / 12TH CHAITHRA 1931

¶4

Bail Appl..No. 1114 of 2009() ----------------------------CRIME NO.21 OF 2009 OF THIRUVAMBADY POLICE STATION

¶5

PETITIONER/ACCUSED --------------------------------------

¶6

ANSAR MUHAMMED, S/O.MYMOONA, AMBALANCHERY HOUSE, KOOMBARA BAZAR P.O., KOODARANHI, KOZHIKODE.

¶7

BY ADV. SRI.SUNNY MATHEW

¶8

RESPONDENT(S): STATE OF KERALA

¶9

¶10

THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVAMBADY POLICE STATION.

¶11

THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THAMARASSERY. (RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM).

¶12

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ

¶13

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶15

......................................... B.A. No.1114 of 2009

¶16

.......................................... Dated: 02.04.2009

¶17

ORDER

¶18

Petitioner, who is the sole accused in Crime No.21 of 2009 of Thiruvambady Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 498A and 306 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail.

¶19

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

¶20

Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have his application for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer on any day between 8.04.2009 and 13.4.2009 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. The petitioner shall thereafter be produced on the same day before the Magistrate who shall consider and dispose of his application for regular bail preferably on the same date on which it is filed.

¶21

This petition is disposed of as above.

¶22

Dated this the 2^nd day of April, 2009.

¶23

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

¶24

Ansar Muhammed v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ansar Muhammed v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Mohammedali Vs State of Kerala

Sreenivasan Vs State of Kerala

Muhammed Saneer @ Saneer and Another Vs the C.I.of Police Kodungallur Police Sta

C.v.Kunhippa Vs Circle Inspector of Police, Ponnani

Junid T.S. Vs State of Kerala

Pradeep and Another Vs State of Kerala