Shajan v. Kunjappan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court quashed an order staying suit proceedings to allow the petitioner, defendant No.1 in a suit, to amend his written statement under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, as the plaintiff raised no objection. The application was allowed, and amendment was permitted.
What did the court decide?
I.A.526 of 2008 allowed; petitioner permitted to amend written statement as sought.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
MONDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2008 / 19TH JYAISHTA 1930
WP(C).No. 9617 of 2008(T)
------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER DATED / / IN IA 526/08 IN OS.43/2004 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,KOCHI
PETITIONER:
SHAJAN, AGED 28 YEARS, S/O. GEORGE, KAPITHANPARAMBIL HOUSE, ELAMKUNNAPUZHA P.O., VYPIN, ERNAKULAM.
BY ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE SRI.A.V.JOJO SRI.SAJIV C.KRISHNAN
RESPONDENTS:
- KUNJAPPAN, AGED 54, S/O. MYLANKUTTY, NIKATHITHARA HOUSE, NAYARAMBALAM P.O., NAYARAMBALAM VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant permission to the petitioner to amend his written statement under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SHAJAN
- respondent
KUNJAPPAN
- respondent
KARTHEDOM RURAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court