Reghu v. K.C.George
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petitioner challenged the Munsiff's refusal to set aside a Commissioner's plan and report regarding a property dispute involving alleged inclusion of a 'thodu'. The court observed arguments but closed the petition without substantive decision.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 28TH MARCH 2008 / 8TH CHAITHRA 1930
WP(C).No. 8897 of 2008(H)
--------------------------------------
PETITIONER:
--------------------
REGHU, PUNNASSERILTHARAYIL, KARAZHMA PADINJATTUM MURI, CHENNITHALA VILLAGE.
BY ADV. SRI.R.KRISHNA RAJ
RESPONDENT:
-----------------------
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ court can interfere with the refusal of the Munsiff to set aside the Commissioner's plan and report in the underlying civil suit.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Reghu Punnasserilthayaril
- respondent
K.C. George
Coram
M.N. Krishnan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court