K.H.Latheef v. Village Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
What did the court decide?
Fourth respondent directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3 within two months after hearing the petitioner; proceedings under Ext.P1 kept in abeyance.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI
TUESDAY, THE 1ST JANUARY 2008 / 11TH POUSHA 1929
WP(C).No. 38316 of 2007(J) --------------------------
PETITIONER:
K.H. LATHEEF, S/O.K.M.HASSAN, AGED 45,
XII/216, PANAYAPALLY, KOCHI-2.
BY ADV. SRI.S.RENJITH
RESPONDENTS:
- VILLAGE OFFICER, THOPPUMPADY, KOCHI-5.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.H. LATHEEF
- respondent
VILLAGE OFFICER, THOPPUMPADY, KOCHI-5
- respondent
DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (R.R.) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (R.R.) FORT KOCHI, KOCHI-1
- respondent
DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD
- respondent
PORT OFFICER, PORT OFFICE, NEENDAKARA, ASHRAMAM, KOLLAM-2
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court